Lingua franca

Raj Thackeray is playing a very dangerous political game. He may say that he is fighting for Marathi pride, but in the end it is nothing but politics, and a dangerous version of it. And the problem is, there are people who sympathize with him. India is a vast country with a population greater than most continents – actually all of them except Asia. And the diversity – languages and dialects, religions, ethnicity – is mind boggling. In my opinion, the only reason we still live together under the umbrella called India is because of the division of the states on the basis of language, something which allowed people to keep their languages and customs and regional identity alive and still call themselves Indian. But does this freedom mean that the state or whosoever anoints himself as the spokesman for the natives is granted the license to force feed the local language and customs to every one who comes and settles down in a state – either temporarily or permanently? For that is what the senior Thackeray in Maharashtra and the Dravidian movement in Tamil Nadu resorted to in the past, and the MNS and KRV are resorting to in present day Maharashtra and Karnataka respectively.

Languages serve a single purpose – facilitate communication. If you go to China and cannot speak Mandarin, and have to communicate with someone who cannot speak English, you have a problem. But when two people can communicate in a common language, even if such a language is not their “mother tongue”, it is the communication that matters, not the language. And the fact is, if you know English and Hindi, you can travel through most of India without facing too many problems. So the question is, why is it necessary that a madrasi or bhaiyya or gujju or your-favorite-pejorative-term who has settled in Mumbai learn Marathi if he can go about his job with the knowledge of Hindi and English? That is the only way he can show that he respects the local culture? The fact that he has left his state to come and settle down in Maharashtra because he finds it better than his home state in terms of facilities and freedom offered is an insult to Maharashtra and its native people? What kind of perverse logic is that? And this is such a slippery slope that things will just get worse. Not only has Bombay become Mumbai, but it is demanded that everyone address it as such. What next? Force people to wear native outfits, cook and eat native cuisine, watch native movies and dramas, demand that they stop patronizing “foreign” gods (Tirupati, Vaishnodevi) and start donating to “local” gods (Siddhivinayak, Shirdi Sai Baba)?

The renaming of cities, forcing people to put up signages in the local language, making school children give up English education (English is the lingua franca of global trade, commerce, technology and education) in favor of the “mother tongue”, telling people to leave their festivals and cultural identity outside before entering the state is nothing but skulduggery of the worst kind. And using the law to do it is so wrong that I don’t have a word for it. Languages and cultures don’t survive if you force them down people’s throats. The only way they can survive is when they are voluntarily adopted by people. Force can only give rise to hatred and bad blood. If Thackeray really wants to protect Marathi pride, and it does not need any protection, he should stop his use of force on every single issue. Three odd years ago, he split from the Shiv Sena to start the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena – Nav is “new” and nirman is “construction”. But he forgot that a state’s identity cannot be rebuilt by terrorizing a section of its inhabitants – particularly those who happen to come from other states. Intolerance can only generate contempt – not admiration, and use of force can only generate fear – not respect.

Thinking about the whole matter, I don’t see things changing for the better. While “unity in diversity” has kept the states together, inter-state feuds and culture clashes are only going to increase in the future. India doesn’t need external enemies. Its citizens and their intolerance are an excellent substitute.

Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.


  • yet_another_hindu_infidel  On August 30, 2008 at 12:18 am

    i believe the brats really making a connection with the suburban stock of mahatastrian india. anti-bhaiya elements are common here in mumbai trains. about a few months back, me and my friends were on our way to vacationing in goa and got in a general coach train. we were surprised to find crowds all the way in goa gloryfing his moment. some bhaiya’s were seriously and violently bullied there and the reaction of the people in the train was a surprising also. some were laughing and while most didn’t even consider noticing it as if it was an everyday occurrence. a very crazy vibe indeed.

  • aristotlethegeek  On August 30, 2008 at 4:56 am

    In Mumbai (any metro for that matter), I doubt if people will come to your rescue if you are being robbed, or stabbed, or set on fire. Its the fear of violence that is at play, or worse – indifference. I doubt if the people who were doing the bullying belonged to the average middle class Maharashtrian family, because the Indian middle class is highly predictable – keep your nose clean, go to work and come back. Period. They must have been a group of out of work louts, or workers belonging to one of the Senas.

    The Rediff columnist has a romantic notion of life in the state. People here are just as good (or as bad) as anywhere else. The only difference between Maharashtra and other states, the northern ones especially, is the governance, law and order situation and infrastructure; and the politicians have been killing this USP softly over the last decade. God save Maharashtra.

  • mahadevrao  On August 30, 2008 at 4:37 pm

    Is a Good job for souil son.that movment is imp

  • you12  On August 31, 2008 at 10:37 pm

    There is an old saying: “Barking dogs don’t bite”. Sooner or later the Maratha population will not be enough for votes than it will be an all inclusive policy.IE. ShivSena.

    Politically speaking RT is not a smart man. Instead of using a dividing policy he should have used an all inclusive policy with slogans like Maharashtra for everyone or something along those lines. MNS could have easily become a Regional force by now instead of a by goons for goons party that it is. He should have taken example from his Uncle who owns the monopoly in the Goons party department but still has not achieved anything substantial after so many years.

  • aristotlethegeek  On August 31, 2008 at 11:21 pm

    What if RT were trying to preempt a further change in demographics?

  • you12  On September 1, 2008 at 5:27 pm

    I don’t think so. His superiors(Bigger parties who don’t want to lose the Maratha vote) may allow him to create some chaos but if he starts doing something that changes the state entirely in his own favor he’ll be curbed.

  • you12  On September 6, 2008 at 9:22 am

    There is only one solution for this:

    Agree with all the conditions of RT and other “Maratha warriors”, reservation, ban on migration towards MH etc…

    But also pass a law which prohibits Marathis from moving anywhere out of MH in the name of preserving Marathi culture.

  • aristotlethegeek  On September 7, 2008 at 12:43 am

    Not going to happen. People like RT come and go, but things remain the same.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: